I figured that if you put me in a room with 100 of my fellow Arlingtonians, I would know at least one, and so that was what was on my mind as I rode the elevator to the 10th floor of the courthouse for jury duty this morning. And sure enough, shortly after checking in, I spotted a teacher from my former school busily working on emails and grades. Then, when they called everyone's name "in random order," I heard one I recognized; a student who I knew from swimming and basketball was staring at her phone across the room. I never would have picked her out of a crowd (clearly), but it had been about 15 years since I'd seen her last.
They asked us to be there at 8:45, "not too late, not too early," but they were still checking folks in at 9:30. The court employees obviously had a system; there were several pointers listed on a whiteboard with the legend "never erase" scrawled across the top, but I was struck at how it still seemed that they were making it up as they went. This was especially true when they called us up by rows of tables to receive our 50 dollar bills; the signature sheets were strewn across the table, forcing prospective jurors to pass them back and forth like bread baskets at a restaurant.
It was eerily quiet up there as we waited, too. Everyone looked at a screen or a book or a newspaper or out the window at the planes landing and taking off over the Potomac. At around 10:15 they warned us to use the restroom and stow our electronics because someone was coming to take 26 of us into the courtroom. I quickly realized that they were calling us in the same random order we had answered attendance to, and I was sure I would not be in the group. The other teacher was, though, and I knew my name was only a few after hers.
Once they left, we were given no further instructions for about an hour. Then they told us to hit the bathrooms again because they were coming for a few more. This time, my name was the seventh called, and I quickly gathered my things, accepted the laminated sheet with the number 33 printed on it, and lined up out in the hall. A short time later, we were shown into the courtroom, and the first 12 of us took our seats in the jury box while the other 14 sat in the pew-like audience section.
It was unclear if this was another trial or the same one-- there was no sign of the other 26 people. In a few moments, we met the judge, the Commonwealth's attorneys, and the defense attorney (all women), and voir dire began. I was surprised by how much information they gave us about the case and also a little shocked that it was a sex offense trial. Not only that, but it was basically a she-said-he-said situation, although there was some type of audio recording.
I answered the questions honestly, but there were none posed to me directly. There were no clear reasons to dismiss me out of hand, and as the many sidebars went on, I wondered how I would be able to weigh the evidence if I was chosen when it was all testimony and circumstantial. I also dreaded spending the predicted three days immersed in such an ugly situation. Still, I was willing to meet this obligation, and I was curious to see what the experience of serving on a jury would be like.
They brought in the remaining 16 prospective jurors from the other group, and we listened to the judge describe our duties as the attorneys made their strikes. In the end, I was the last person struck, and I have no idea if it was a prosecution or defense choice. As I stood for a moment at the back of the room with the other 20 people who were also exiting the court, I looked at the 13 people who were chosen.
They were young, in their 30s and 40s, except for one man who looked to be in in his late 60s. They were a diverse group, on the surface: several races and ethnicities seemed to be represented, and one woman wore a headscarf. More than half were men. I was a tiny bit disappointed, but not really, and I silently wished them all the best of luck as I headed out into the cold, bright January afternoon.