In my "progressive" school system, we used to treat student success on high-stakes standardized tests as a necessary evil; but now those unreliable numbers are gaining major traction as a valid measure of student, teacher, and school success. Clearly some of it is pragmatism, but how can calculating the number of sub-group students (to the tenths place) who must pass so that the school can achieve our federally mandated annually measured objectives be construed as anything but cynical?
I can just hear the conversations in our PLC now. Dang! We missed it my three tenths of an Asian.
I can just hear the conversations in our PLC now. Dang! We missed it my three tenths of an Asian.